[PATCH] staging: vchiq: Fix list_for_each exit tests
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at oracle.com
Mon Sep 28 09:11:03 UTC 2020
This code code here used to be list_for_each() and after the loop then
the "entry" pointer was non-NULL if we found the correct entry or NULL
if we couldn't find it. Then we changed the code to use list_for_each_entry()
and so now the "entry" pointer is always non-NULL when we exit the loop.
I have introduced a new "found" variable to say if we found the correct
enty or not. I fixed one test by making it an else statement because
that was more readable than testing "if (!found)".
Fixes: 46e4b9ec4fa4 ("staging: vchiq_arm: use list_for_each_entry when accessing bulk_waiter_list")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
---
.../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
index bb0cc9cb96e9..c25fc559cd36 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(unsigned int handle, void *data,
struct vchiq_service *service;
enum vchiq_status status;
struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter = NULL;
+ bool found = false;
service = find_service_by_handle(handle);
if (!service)
@@ -443,12 +444,13 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(unsigned int handle, void *data,
list_for_each_entry(waiter, &instance->bulk_waiter_list, list) {
if (waiter->pid == current->pid) {
list_del(&waiter->list);
+ found = true;
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&instance->bulk_waiter_list_mutex);
- if (waiter) {
+ if (found) {
struct vchiq_bulk *bulk = waiter->bulk_waiter.bulk;
if (bulk) {
@@ -464,9 +466,7 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(unsigned int handle, void *data,
spin_unlock(&bulk_waiter_spinlock);
}
}
- }
-
- if (!waiter) {
+ } else {
waiter = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bulk_waiter_node), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!waiter) {
vchiq_log_error(vchiq_core_log_level,
@@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static int vchiq_irq_queue_bulk_tx_rx(struct vchiq_instance *instance,
{
struct vchiq_service *service;
struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter = NULL;
+ bool found = false;
int status = 0;
int ret;
@@ -967,11 +968,12 @@ static int vchiq_irq_queue_bulk_tx_rx(struct vchiq_instance *instance,
list) {
if (waiter->pid == current->pid) {
list_del(&waiter->list);
+ found = true;
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&instance->bulk_waiter_list_mutex);
- if (!waiter) {
+ if (!found) {
vchiq_log_error(vchiq_arm_log_level,
"no bulk_waiter found for pid %d",
current->pid);
--
2.28.0
More information about the devel
mailing list