[PATCH v11 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

Florian Fainelli f.fainelli at gmail.com
Mon Sep 7 18:29:06 UTC 2020



On 9/7/2020 10:43 AM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patchset Summary:
>>>>>>     Enhance a PCIe host controller driver.  Because of its unusual design
>>>>>>     we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role
>>>>>>     allowing multiple offsets.  See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is
>>>>> any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the
>>>>> 5.10 merge window.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the
>>>>> ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
>>>>
>>>> FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree.
>>>> I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that
>>>> apply the current version.
>>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as
>> is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ?
> Hello Lorenzo,
> 
> We are still working out a regression with the DMA offset commit on
> the RaspberryPi.  Nicolas has found the root cause and we are now
> devising a solution.

Maybe we can parallelize the PCIe driver review while the DMA changes 
are being worked on in Christoph's branch. Lorenzo, are you fine with 
the PCIe changes proper?
-- 
Florian


More information about the devel mailing list