[PATCH v2] staging: vt6656: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of hardcoded size

[Quentin Deslandes]

On 03/24/20 16:18:30, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> That's a bit over engineering something which is pretty trivial.
> Normally, we would just make the size a define instead of a magic number
> 14.

My bad, I meant "define", not "macro".

> If people change the size in the future (unlikely) and it causes a bug
> then they kind of deserve it because they need to ensure all the new
> stuff is initialized, right?  If they change it and it results in a
> buffer overflow then static checkers would complain.  If they changed it
> and it resulted in uninitialized data being used then it would be zero
> so that's okay.

I wasn't sure where I should stand on this, that's clearer now.

Thanks,
Quentin