[PATCH 1/6] staging: dpaa2-ethsw: verify the nofifier block

Ioana Ciornei ioana.ciornei at nxp.com
Tue Jul 21 09:19:14 UTC 2020


Since now we have a notifier block for each DPSW instance probed, we
have to also check that the netdev is indeed connected to the notifier
received. Without this, we end up with the same switchdev callback being
executed multiple times (because it would be received by all notifier
blocks, not just the one intended to).
Also, move the function higher in the source file because it will be
used in later patches from multiple places.

Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei at nxp.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c
index 2fb75a7c9314..557a75115da8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c
@@ -749,6 +749,20 @@ static const struct net_device_ops ethsw_port_ops = {
 	.ndo_get_phys_port_name = port_get_phys_name,
 };
 
+static bool ethsw_port_dev_check(const struct net_device *netdev,
+				 struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	struct ethsw_port_priv *port_priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+	if (netdev->netdev_ops == &ethsw_port_ops &&
+	    (!nb || &port_priv->ethsw_data->port_nb == nb ||
+	     &port_priv->ethsw_data->port_switchdev_nb == nb ||
+	     &port_priv->ethsw_data->port_switchdevb_nb == nb))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void ethsw_links_state_update(struct ethsw_core *ethsw)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -1199,12 +1213,7 @@ static int port_bridge_leave(struct net_device *netdev)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static bool ethsw_port_dev_check(const struct net_device *netdev)
-{
-	return netdev->netdev_ops == &ethsw_port_ops;
-}
-
-static int port_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
+static int port_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				unsigned long event, void *ptr)
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
@@ -1212,7 +1221,7 @@ static int port_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
 	struct net_device *upper_dev;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (!ethsw_port_dev_check(netdev))
+	if (!ethsw_port_dev_check(netdev, nb))
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	/* Handle just upper dev link/unlink for the moment */
@@ -1280,7 +1289,7 @@ static void ethsw_switchdev_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
 }
 
 /* Called under rcu_read_lock() */
-static int port_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
+static int port_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				unsigned long event, void *ptr)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
@@ -1289,7 +1298,7 @@ static int port_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
 	struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info *fdb_info = ptr;
 	struct ethsw_core *ethsw = port_priv->ethsw_data;
 
-	if (!ethsw_port_dev_check(dev))
+	if (!ethsw_port_dev_check(dev, nb))
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	if (event == SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET)
@@ -1353,12 +1362,12 @@ ethsw_switchdev_port_obj_event(unsigned long event, struct net_device *netdev,
 	return notifier_from_errno(err);
 }
 
-static int port_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
+static int port_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 					 unsigned long event, void *ptr)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
 
-	if (!ethsw_port_dev_check(dev))
+	if (!ethsw_port_dev_check(dev, nb))
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	switch (event) {
-- 
2.25.1



More information about the devel mailing list