[PATCH v1 03/10] KVM: Prepare kvm_is_reserved_pfn() for PG_reserved changes
dan.j.williams at intel.com
Tue Nov 5 23:43:29 UTC 2019
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:30 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:13 PM Sean Christopherson
> <sean.j.christopherson at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:02:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:31 PM David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > The scarier code (for me) is transparent_hugepage_adjust() and
> > > > > kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(), as I don't at all understand the
> > > > > interaction between THP and _PAGE_DEVMAP.
> > > >
> > > > The x86 KVM MMU code is one of the ugliest code I know (sorry, but it
> > > > had to be said :/ ). Luckily, this should be independent of the
> > > > PG_reserved thingy AFAIKs.
> > >
> > > Both transparent_hugepage_adjust() and kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte()
> > > are honoring kvm_is_reserved_pfn(), so again I'm missing where the
> > > page count gets mismanaged and leads to the reported hang.
> > When mapping pages into the guest, KVM gets the page via gup(), which
> > increments the page count for ZONE_DEVICE pages. But KVM puts the page
> > using kvm_release_pfn_clean(), which skips put_page() if PageReserved()
> > and so never puts its reference to ZONE_DEVICE pages.
> Oh, yeah, that's busted.
Ugh, it's extra busted because every other gup user in the kernel
tracks the pages resulting from gup and puts them (put_page()) when
they are done. KVM wants to forget about whether it did a gup to get
the page and optionally trigger put_page() based purely on the pfn.
Outside of VFIO device assignment that needs pages pinned for DMA, why
does KVM itself need to pin pages? If pages are pinned over a return
to userspace that needs to be a FOLL_LONGTERM gup.
More information about the devel