[PATCH 2/5] staging: kpc2000: declare two functions as static.

[Jeremy Sowden]

Two functions were not used outside the translation-unit in which they
were defined.  Declared them static.

Fixes two sparse warnings:

  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:98:5: warning: symbol 'probe_core_basic' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:288:5: warning: symbol 'probe_core_uio' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy at azazel.net>
---
 drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c
index fc7038152bb4..30e6f176ddfa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c
@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ void parse_core_table_entry(struct core_table_entry *cte, const u64 read_val, co
 }
 
 
-int  probe_core_basic(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard, char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
+static int probe_core_basic(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard,
+			    char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
 {
     struct mfd_cell  cell = {0};
     struct resource  resources[2];
@@ -257,7 +258,8 @@ int kuio_irqcontrol(struct uio_info *uioinfo, s32 irq_on)
     return 0;
 }
 
-int  probe_core_uio(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard, char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
+static int probe_core_uio(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard,
+			  char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
 {
     struct kpc_uio_device  *kudev;
     int rv;
-- 
2.20.1