[PATCH v4 4/9] staging:iio:ad7780: add chip ID values and mask

[Renato Lui Geh]

On 03/01, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
>On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 11:24 -0300, Renato Lui Geh wrote:
>>
>>
>> The ad7780 supports both the ad778x and ad717x families. Each chip has
>> a corresponding ID. This patch provides a mask for extracting ID values
>> from the status bits and also macros for the correct values for the
>> ad7170, ad7171, ad7780 and ad7781.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c | 8 ++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> index 56c49e28f432..ad7617a3a141 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> @@ -26,10 +26,14 @@
>>  #define AD7780_RDY             BIT(7)
>>  #define AD7780_FILTER          BIT(6)
>>  #define AD7780_ERR             BIT(5)
>> -#define AD7780_ID1             BIT(4)
>> -#define AD7780_ID0             BIT(3)
>>  #define AD7780_GAIN            BIT(2)
>>
>> +#define AD7170_ID              0
>> +#define AD7171_ID              1
>> +#define AD7780_ID              1
>> +#define AD7781_ID              0
>> +
>> +#define AD7780_ID_MASK         (BIT(3) | BIT(4))
>
>This also doesn't have any functionality change.
>The AD7170_ID, AD7171_ID, AD7780_ID & AD7781_ID IDs are also unused (maybe
>in a later patch they are ?).

They aren't. I added them following a previous review suggestion. Should
I remove them?
>
>I would also leave the AD7780_ID1 & AD7780_ID0 definitions in place, since
>they're easier matched with the datasheet.
>
>>
>>  #define AD7780_PATTERN_GOOD    1
>>  #define AD7780_PATTERN_MASK    GENMASK(1, 0)
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>