[PATCH RFC 2/6] staging: most: rename core.h to most.h
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Tue Dec 10 09:42:44 UTC 2019
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 01:25:17PM +0000, Christian.Gromm at microchip.com wrote:
> On Fr, 2019-12-06 at 15:35 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Christian Gromm wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch renames the core header file core.h to most.h. The
> > > intention
> > > behind this is to have a meaningful name once this file is moved to
> > > the
> > > /include/linux directory.
> > Does everything in this .h file have to be exposed to the whole
> > kernel?
> > Are there any things in here that are local only to the most "core"
> > code?
> > If this whole thing is public, you might want to clean up your naming
> > of
> > some structures:
> Yes, those structs are needed by modules registering with the core.
> Do you want me to reroll v2 of this set with these changes or to wait
> for more comments to come?
Please resend, I doubt there is anything else going to be reviewed on
this at the moment.
Note, I applied the first patch in this series already, no need to
More information about the devel