[PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging

Richard Weinberger richard at nod.at
Mon Aug 19 07:37:12 UTC 2019


----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:29:38AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> Not sure what you're even disagreeing with, as I *do* expect new filesystems to
>> be held to a high standard, and to be written with the assumption that the
>> on-disk data may be corrupted or malicious.  We just can't expect the bar to be
>> so high (e.g. no bugs) that it's never been attained by *any* filesystem even
>> after years/decades of active development.  If the developers were careful, the
>> code generally looks robust, and they are willing to address such bugs as they
>> are found, realistically that's as good as we can expect to get...
> 
> Well, the impression I got from Richards quick look and the reply to it is
> that there is very little attempt to validate the ondisk data structure
> and there is absolutely no priority to do so.  Which is very different
> from there is a bug or two here and there.

On the plus side, everything I reported got fixed within hours.

Thanks,
//richard


More information about the devel mailing list