[PATCH RFC] staging: wilc1000: give usleep_range a range

[Nicholas Mc Guire]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 06:31:21PM +0000, Adham.Abozaeid at microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Nicolas
> 
> On 4/8/19 6:36 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:10:00PM +0000, Adham.Abozaeid at microchip.com wrote:
> >> Hi Nicholas
> >>
> >> On 4/6/19 5:01 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> >>> External E-Mail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Someone that knows the motivation for setting the time to 2 millisecond
> >>> might need to check if the 2 milliseconds where seen as tollerable max or
> >>> min - I'm assuming it was the min so extending.
> >> 2 msec is the time the chip takes to wake up from sleep.
> >>
> >> Increasing the maximum to 5 msec will impact the throughput since this call is on the transmit path.
> >>
> > ok - would it be tollerable to make it 2 - 2.5 ms ?
> > even that would allow for the hrtimer subsystem to optimize
> > a lot. In any case the min==max case gives you very little
> > if you run a test-case with usleep_range(1000,1000) and
> > a loop with usleep_range(1000,2000) and look at the distribution
> > you will have a hard time seeing any difference.
> 
> yes, I believe 2.5 shouldn't be a problem.
>
thanks - will send out a V2 then shortly.

thx!
hofrat