[PATCH 1/2] FBTFT: fb_sh: Fix alignment and style problems Fixed Coding style issues Signed-off-by: Tamir Suliman <tsuliman at linuxvaults.com>

Joe Perches joe at perches.com
Sat Jun 30 16:20:27 UTC 2018


On Sat, 2018-06-30 at 14:32 +0000, Tamir Suliman wrote:
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_sh1106.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Adding to what Greg's patchbot already wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_sh1106.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_sh1106.c
[]
> @@ -36,27 +36,27 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
>  	par->fbtftops.reset(par);
>  
>  	/* Set Display OFF */
> -	write_reg(par, 0xAE);
> +		write_reg(par, 0xAE);


Nope.

You are overly indenting already correctly indented code.
Statements start in the same column unless following an
if/for/do/while/else/case.

> @@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ static void set_addr_win(struct fbtft_par *par, int xs, int ys, int xe, int ye)
>  
>  static int blank(struct fbtft_par *par, bool on)
>  {
> -	fbtft_par_dbg(DEBUG_BLANK, par, "%s(blank=%s)\n",
> -		      __func__, on ? "true" : "false");
> +	fbtft_par_dbg(DEBUG_BLANK, par, "%s(_func_=%s)\n",
> +			__func__, on ? "true" : "false");

Again, nope.

Here you are misaligning a multi-line continuation
which is correctly aligned to the open parenthesis.



More information about the devel mailing list