[PATCH 2/2] Staging: nvec: nvec: fixed check style issues

Marc Dietrich marvin24 at gmx.de
Mon Dec 17 19:48:04 UTC 2018


Hi,

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, Greg KH wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 08:57:43AM -0800, Amir Mahdi Ghorbanian wrote:
>> @@ -626,7 +628,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>>  		break;
>>  	case 2:		/* first byte after command */
>>  		if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
>> -			udelay(33);
>> +			usleep_range(0, 33);
>
> Why is this a valid range to sleep for for this device?  Have you been
> able to verify/test this?

oh no, not again. Why does this come up again every half year? This udelay 
is a workaround for a hw bug which only seldom triggers (if it triggers at 
all). Secondly, this is in interrupt context, so *sleep timers are no go, 
afaik.

Marc



More information about the devel mailing list