[PATCH 12/44] staging: unisys: visorbus: remove invalid comment, we are one driver.

[David Kershner]

Removed a comment that was describing the relationship between the
visorchipset driver and the visorbus driver. Since they are now one
driver the comment no longer makes sense.

Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kershner at unisys.com>
Reviewed-by: Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <timothy.sell at unisys.com>
---
 drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
index bb1b6a0..b99adaa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
@@ -1227,14 +1227,6 @@ initiate_chipset_device_pause_resume(struct visor_device *dev, bool is_pause)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Note that even though both drv->pause() and drv->resume
-	 * specify a callback function, it is NOT necessary for us to
-	 * increment our local module usage count.  Reason is, there
-	 * is already a linkage dependency between child function
-	 * drivers and visorbus, so it is already IMPOSSIBLE to unload
-	 * visorbus while child function drivers are still running.
-	 */
 	if (is_pause) {
 		if (!drv->pause) {
 			(*notify_func)(dev, -EINVAL);
-- 
git-series 0.9.1