[PATCH v2] staging: vt6656: fixed an indentation coding style issue
Prasant Jalan
prasant.jalan at gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 23:32:59 UTC 2017
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Prasant Jalan <prasant.jalan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Arushi Singhal
> <arushisinghal19971997 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Prasant Jalan <prasant.jalan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Replacing spaces with tabs for indetation to fix checkpatch.pl error
>>> "code indent should use tabs where possible".
>>
>> I think the commit message should be much more clear as for "code
>> indentation"
>> you are even adding and deleting spaces.
>>>
>>>
>
> Hi Arushi,
>
> Thanks for comments and sorry to bother with a coding style fix patch.
> I'm just trying to learn and felt its an easy one.
>
> I did not understand your comment "adding and deleting spaces".
> I'm only deleting spaces and replacing it with tabs.
> I'm not adding spaces. Could you please clarify.
>
> Regards, Prasant
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Prasant Jalan <prasant.jalan at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - improved changelog comments
>>> - fixed only one issue
>>>
>>>
>>> drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
>>> index 1835cd1..7ebd1ee 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static __le16 vnt_time_stamp_off(struct vnt_private
>>> *priv, u16 rate)
>>> }
>>>
>>> static u32 vnt_get_rsvtime(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 pkt_type,
>>> - u32 frame_length, u16 rate, int need_ack)
>>> + u32 frame_length, u16 rate, int need_ack)
>>> {
>>> u32 data_time, ack_time;
>>>
>>> @@ -135,14 +135,16 @@ static u32 vnt_get_rsvtime(struct vnt_private *priv,
>>> u8 pkt_type,
>>> }
>>>
>>> static __le16 vnt_rxtx_rsvtime_le16(struct vnt_private *priv, u8
>>> pkt_type,
>>> - u32 frame_length, u16 rate, int
>>> need_ack)
>>> + u32 frame_length, u16 rate,
>>> + int need_ack)
>>> {
>>> return cpu_to_le16((u16)vnt_get_rsvtime(priv, pkt_type,
>>> frame_length, rate, need_ack));
>>> }
>>>
>>> static __le16 vnt_get_rtscts_rsvtime_le(struct vnt_private *priv,
>>> - u8 rsv_type, u8 pkt_type, u32
>>> frame_length, u16 current_rate)
>>> + u8 rsv_type, u8 pkt_type,
>>> + u32 frame_length, u16
>>> current_rate)
>>> {
>>> u32 rrv_time, rts_time, cts_time, ack_time, data_time;
>>>
>>> @@ -160,19 +162,19 @@ static __le16 vnt_get_rtscts_rsvtime_le(struct
>>> vnt_private *priv,
>>> rts_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type, 20, priv->top_cck_basic_rate);
>>> cts_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type,
>>> - 14,
>>> priv->top_cck_basic_rate);
>>> + 14,
>>> priv->top_cck_basic_rate);
>>> ack_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type,
>>> - 14,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> + 14,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> } else if (rsv_type == 2) {
>>> rts_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type,
>>> - 20,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> + 20,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> cts_time = ack_time =
>>> vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type, 14, priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> } else if (rsv_type == 3) {
>>> cts_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type,
>>> - 14,
>>> priv->top_cck_basic_rate);
>>> + 14,
>>> priv->top_cck_basic_rate);
>>> ack_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> pkt_type,
>>> - 14,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> + 14,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>>
>>> rrv_time = cts_time + ack_time + data_time + 2 *
>>> priv->sifs;
>>>
>>> @@ -227,7 +229,8 @@ static __le16 vnt_get_rtscts_duration_le(struct
>>> vnt_usb_send_context *context,
>>> case RTSDUR_AA_F0:
>>> case RTSDUR_AA_F1:
>>> cts_time = vnt_get_frame_time(priv->preamble_type,
>>> - pkt_type, 14,
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> + pkt_type, 14,
>>> +
>>> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate);
>>> dur_time = cts_time + 2 * priv->sifs +
>>> vnt_get_rsvtime(priv, pkt_type,
>>> frame_length, rate, need_ack);
>>> @@ -410,7 +413,7 @@ static u16 vnt_rxtx_rts_g_head(struct
>>> vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
>>> u16 current_rate = tx_context->tx_rate;
>>>
>>> vnt_get_phy_field(priv, rts_frame_len, priv->top_cck_basic_rate,
>>> - PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
>>> + PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
>>> vnt_get_phy_field(priv, rts_frame_len, priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate,
>>> tx_context->pkt_type, &buf->a);
>>>
>>> @@ -437,7 +440,7 @@ static u16 vnt_rxtx_rts_g_fb_head(struct
>>> vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
>>> u16 rts_frame_len = 20;
>>>
>>> vnt_get_phy_field(priv, rts_frame_len, priv->top_cck_basic_rate,
>>> - PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
>>> + PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
>>> vnt_get_phy_field(priv, rts_frame_len, priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate,
>>> tx_context->pkt_type, &buf->a);
>>>
>>> @@ -683,9 +686,9 @@ static u16 vnt_rxtx_ab(struct vnt_usb_send_context
>>> *tx_context,
>>> }
>>>
>>> static u16 vnt_generate_tx_parameter(struct vnt_usb_send_context
>>> *tx_context,
>>> - struct vnt_tx_buffer *tx_buffer,
>>> - struct vnt_mic_hdr **mic_hdr, u32
>>> need_mic,
>>> - bool need_rts)
>>> + struct vnt_tx_buffer *tx_buffer,
>>> + struct vnt_mic_hdr **mic_hdr,
>>> + u32 need_mic, bool need_rts)
>>> {
>>>
>>> if (tx_context->pkt_type == PK_TYPE_11GB ||
>>> @@ -1024,7 +1027,7 @@ static int vnt_beacon_xmit(struct vnt_private *priv,
>>>
>>> /* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
>>> vnt_get_phy_field(priv, frame_size, current_rate,
>>> - PK_TYPE_11A, &short_head->ab);
>>> + PK_TYPE_11A, &short_head->ab);
>>>
>>> /* Get Duration and TimeStampOff */
>>> short_head->duration = vnt_get_duration_le(priv,
>>> @@ -1101,7 +1104,7 @@ int vnt_beacon_make(struct vnt_private *priv, struct
>>> ieee80211_vif *vif)
>>> }
>>>
>>> int vnt_beacon_enable(struct vnt_private *priv, struct ieee80211_vif
>>> *vif,
>>> - struct ieee80211_bss_conf *conf)
>>> + struct ieee80211_bss_conf *conf)
>>> {
>>> vnt_mac_reg_bits_off(priv, MAC_REG_TCR, TCR_AUTOBCNTX);
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>
Hi,
A gentle reminder about my patch (sorry again to bother with a coding
style fix only patch).
Regards, Prasant
More information about the devel
mailing list