[PATCH 8/8] Staging: lustre :lustre: include :lustre_compat.h: Prefer using the BIT macro
Greg KH
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Tue Jul 11 17:08:18 UTC 2017
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:43:15PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> Replace all instances of (1 << 27) with BIT(27) to fix
> checkpatch check messages
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga <rjdurga at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> index da9ce19..686a251 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> * set ATTR_BLOCKS to a high value to avoid any risk of collision with other
> * ATTR_* attributes (see bug 13828)
> */
> -#define ATTR_BLOCKS (1 << 27)
> +#define ATTR_BLOCKS BIT(27)
Isn't this used in lustre's userspace code? If so, you can't use the
BIT() macro there :(
Please check before you redo this.
thanks,
greg k-h
More information about the devel
mailing list