[PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning

[Abdul Rauf]

On 01/10/2017 06:57 PM, Kershner, David A wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Abdul Rauf Mujahid [mailto:abdulraufmujahid at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:51 PM
>> To: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner at unisys.com>;
>> gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; jkc at redhat.com; *S-Par-Maintainer
>> <SParMaintainer at unisys.com>
>> Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/10/2017 06:36 PM, Kershner, David A wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Abdul Rauf [mailto:abdulraufmujahid at gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:24 PM
>>>> To: gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; jkc at redhat.com; *S-Par-Maintainer
>>>> <SParMaintainer at unisys.com>
>>>> Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning
>>> This patch has the same subject line as the previous patch? Which one
>>> should we use? Or can you make the names unique?
>>>
>>> David Kershner
>>>
>>>> Fix the following warnings:
>>>> Block comments should align the * on each line
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rauf <abdulraufmujahid at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> index 336af52d43d7..4e630ea527e8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ parahotplug_process_message(struct
>>>> controlvm_message *inmsg)
>>>>  		 *
>>>>  		 * devices are automatically enabled at
>>>>  		 * initialization.
>>>> -		*/
>>>> +		 */
>>>>  		parahotplug_request_kickoff(req);
>>>>  		controlvm_respond_physdev_changestate
>>>>  			(&inmsg->hdr,
>>>> --
>>>> 2.11.0
>> you should use both of them. I am sending both again by changing their
>> names.
> Thanks!
>
> David Kershner
Please ignore these two patches.
I sent another patch yesterday after merging these two patches in one with subject:
[PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: fix checkpatch block comments warning.
Thanks.