[PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning

Kershner, David A David.Kershner at unisys.com
Tue Jan 10 18:57:43 UTC 2017


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abdul Rauf Mujahid [mailto:abdulraufmujahid at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:51 PM
> To: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner at unisys.com>;
> gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; jkc at redhat.com; *S-Par-Maintainer
> <SParMaintainer at unisys.com>
> Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning
> 
> 
> 
> On 01/10/2017 06:36 PM, Kershner, David A wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Abdul Rauf [mailto:abdulraufmujahid at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:24 PM
> >> To: gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; jkc at redhat.com; *S-Par-Maintainer
> >> <SParMaintainer at unisys.com>
> >> Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning
> > This patch has the same subject line as the previous patch? Which one
> > should we use? Or can you make the names unique?
> >
> > David Kershner
> >
> >> Fix the following warnings:
> >> Block comments should align the * on each line
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rauf <abdulraufmujahid at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
> >> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
> >> index 336af52d43d7..4e630ea527e8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
> >> @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ parahotplug_process_message(struct
> >> controlvm_message *inmsg)
> >>  		 *
> >>  		 * devices are automatically enabled at
> >>  		 * initialization.
> >> -		*/
> >> +		 */
> >>  		parahotplug_request_kickoff(req);
> >>  		controlvm_respond_physdev_changestate
> >>  			(&inmsg->hdr,
> >> --
> >> 2.11.0
> you should use both of them. I am sending both again by changing their
> names.

Thanks!

David Kershner


More information about the devel mailing list