[PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: handle various crash scenarios

KY Srinivasan kys at microsoft.com
Mon Mar 21 22:44:41 UTC 2016



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets at redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 12:52 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com>
> Cc: devel at linuxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Haiyang
> Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com>; Alex Ng (LIS) <alexng at microsoft.com>;
> Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar at redhat.com>; Cathy Avery <cavery at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: handle various crash scenarios
> 
> KY Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> writes:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets at redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 5:33 AM
> >> To: devel at linuxdriverproject.org
> >> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com>;
> >> Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com>; Alex Ng (LIS)
> >> <alexng at microsoft.com>; Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar at redhat.com>; Cathy
> >> Avery <cavery at redhat.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: handle various crash scenarios
> >>
> >> Kdump keeps biting. Turns out CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE is
> always
> >> delivered to CPU0 regardless of what CPU we're sending
> >> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD
> >> from. vmbus_wait_for_unload() doesn't account for the fact that in case
> >> we're crashing on some other CPU and CPU0 is still alive and operational
> >> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE will be delivered there completing
> >> vmbus_connection.unload_event, our wait on the current CPU will never
> >> end.
> >
> > What was the host you were testing on?
> >
> 
> I was testing on both 2012R2 and 2016TP4. The bug is easily reproducible
> by forcing crash on a secondary CPU, e.g.:

Prior to 2012R2, all messages would be delivered on CPU0 and this includes CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE.
For this reason we don't support kexec on pre-2012 R2 hosts. On 2012. From 2012 R2 on, all vmbus 
messages (responses) will be delivered on  the CPU that we initially set up - look at the code in
vmbus_negotiate_version(). So on post 2012 R2 hosts, the response to CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE
will be delivered on the CPU where we initiate the contact with the host - CHANNELMSG_INITIATE_CONTACT message.
So, maybe we can stash away the CPU on which we made the initial contact and poll the state on that CPU
to make forward progress in the case of crash.

Regards,

K. Y

 


More information about the devel mailing list