[PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to differentiate root dprc

[Lijun Pan]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh at linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 9:34 PM
> To: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan at freescale.com>
> Cc: arnd at arndb.de; devel at driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-
> kernel at vger.kernel.org; bhamciu1 at freescale.com; Lijun.Pan2000 at gmail.com;
> bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com; german.rivera at freescale.com;
> agraf at suse.de; stuart.yoder at freescale.com; nir.erez at freescale.com;
> itai.katz at freescale.com; scottwood at freescale.com; leoli at freescale.com;
> R89243 at freescale.com; dan.carpenter at oracle.com;
> richard.schmitt at freescale.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to
> differentiate root dprc
> 
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:25:47PM -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > Define a static inline function is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether a
> > device is root dprc or not via platform_bus_type.
> > Remove fsl_mc_is_root_dprc() because is_root_dprc() is simpler and
> > easier to understand.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan at freescale.com>
> > ---
> > v2: use static inline function instead of macro
> >     replace the fsl_mc_is_root_dprc with is_root_dprc
> 
> 
> This series doesn't apply to my tree anymore, due to another big patcheset for
> this subsystem being applied.  Can you please rebase it against my staging-
> testing branch of staging.git and resend?
> 

Greg,

I have just rebased the patches and re-sended the v3.
Please check your emails.

Thanks
Lijun

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h