[PATCH v3 23/23] staging/rdma/hfi1: Update driver version string to 0.9-294

ira.weiny ira.weiny at intel.com
Tue Oct 27 21:00:22 UTC 2015


On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:46:41PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:28:49AM -0400, ira.weiny at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Jubin John <jubin.john at intel.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jubin John <jubin.john at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h
> > index 7809093eb55e..5dd92720faae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h
> > @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
> >   * to the driver itself, not the software interfaces it supports.
> >   */
> >  #ifndef HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE
> > -#define HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE "0.9-248"
> > +#define HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE "0.9-294"
> 
> Patches like this make no sense at all, please drop it and only use the
> kernel version.

What do you mean by "only use the kernel version"?  Do you mean

#define HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE UTS_RELEASE
     
Or just remove the macro entirely?

>
> Trust me, it's going to get messy really fast (hint, it
> already did...)

Did I base this on the wrong tree?  Not sure how this could have messed you up.

Thanks,
Ira



More information about the devel mailing list