[PATCH v2] Staging: rtl8192u: Fix coding style issues at ieee80211_crypt_wep.c

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 23:56 +0200, pmarzo wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 19:15 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:36:23PM +0200, Pedro Marzo Perez wrote:
> > > Merge two pr_debug lines with literal strings splitted across several lines
> > > into one single line, simplifying prism2_wep_init error check code.
> > > Openning braces should never be in a new line, move them to the end of
> > > the previous line.
> > > Removed two useless lines at ieee80211_wep_null.
> > > 
> > 
> > When Joe said "Some will say this is doing too many things in a single
> > patch." he meant Greg.  Break this up into multiple patches.  Especially
> > now that you've added even more stuff to it.
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> 
> Sorry Joe, English is not my mother tongue and I misunderstand your
> comment, I thought "Some will say this is doing too many things in a
> single patch" did meant "You are on the limit, but it is ok to send it
> in one patch" but I see it really means "please, rewrite this whole crap
> into several patches" :-)

What I meant to say was I don't care as much about mixing
multiple types of fixes in a single patch as others might.

Greg does and generally rejects patches that mix fix types.

My preference is to do _all_ whitespace changes in a single
patch.  If "git diff -w" shows no source code changes, and
objdiff shows no object code change, that's a "single type"
of change to me.

Others disagree and may want whitespace changes broken down
into finer-grained blocks.

I think it's not necessary to modify the same line multiple
times just to get this granularity.

btw: using:

$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --strict --fix-inplace \
   --types=spacing,space_before_tab,pointer_location,trailing_whitespace,bracket_space,space_before_tab,indented_label,parenthesis_alignment \
   $file

can do this moderately well and there's a trivial script to
use checkpatch and git to create a patch series for various
checkpatch type style messages.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/11/794