[PATCH v3 03/33] staging: rtl8192e: Mark unaligned memcpy()
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at oracle.com
Mon May 11 08:26:47 UTC 2015
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:18:51PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
> Comment unaligned memcpy() that trigger PREFER_ETHER_ADDR_COPY
> checkpatch.pl warning.
> It will prevent accidential "Fix" to ether_addr_copy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c
> index ebb328d..65e4d13 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c
> @@ -488,15 +488,19 @@ void rtllib_indicate_packets(struct rtllib_device *ieee, struct rtllib_rxb **prx
> * and replace EtherType
> */
> skb_pull(sub_skb, SNAP_SIZE);
> - memcpy(skb_push(sub_skb, ETH_ALEN), prxb->src, ETH_ALEN);
> - memcpy(skb_push(sub_skb, ETH_ALEN), prxb->dst, ETH_ALEN);
> + memcpy(skb_push(sub_skb, ETH_ALEN), prxb->src,
> + ETH_ALEN); /* Must be unaligned */
Which part isn't aligned? I think they both are.
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the devel
mailing list