[PATCH V2 0/6] iio: mxs-lradc: Clean up and add datasheet names
Jonathan Cameron
jic23 at kernel.org
Sun Jul 19 09:45:29 UTC 2015
On 18/07/15 16:38, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 02:30:40 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> This patch series does some clean up in mxs-lradc and finally add the
>> datasheet names for every usable channel.
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>> - remove confusing i.MX28 specific comments
>> - fix some spelling errors
>> - fix up includes
>> - separate channel spec for i.MX23 and i.MX28
>>
>> Stefan Wahren (6):
>> iio: mxs-lradc: clarify supported devices
>> iio: mxs-lradc: fix some spelling errors
>> iio: mxs-lradc: add missing include
>> iio: mxs-lradc: remove unnecessary header includes
>> iio: mxs-lradc: reorder header includes
>> iio: mxs-lradc: add datasheet name for every usable channel
>>
>> .../bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 122
>> +++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> Entire series
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
Thanks for looking through these.
Just to let you know, there is currently a rather extended discussion going
on (as part of a suggested topic for the kernel summit) about when reviewed-by
tags are appropriate.
The general feeling is they must in someway indicate some substantial work. Here
as a result I'd say it was appropriate for patch 6 whereas an Acked-by
would be more appropriate for the cleanups (where there is nothing 'interesting').
I've left these as reviewed by for this set though!
Note to all reviewers I may also start added reviewed by tags that you haven't sent if
I happen to feel you made a big contribution to review of a patch, but perhaps haven't
revisited later versions. I'll probably send out an email about this outside
of this thread at some point to get possible wider circulation.
Jonathan
>
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
>
More information about the devel
mailing list