use of opaque subject lines

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:30 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Andreas Ruprecht wrote:
> 
> > On a serious note: I do understand what you're getting at, I don't take
> > that personally (and I will send a v2 addressing the things above), but
> > honestly, this kind of answer might just be a real turn-off for other
> > people trying to get into kernel development...
> > 
> > I don't want to start a whole new 'attitude in the kernel community'
> > discussion, but I can't just let this go like that, sorry.

Maybe YA checkpatch warning when patch subjects
include either "checkpatch" or "sparse" would help?

Something like:
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 3642b0d..b6bed59 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2170,6 +2170,13 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# Check email subject for poor style
+		if ($in_header_lines &&
+		    $line =~ /^Subject:.*\b(?:checkpatch|sparse)\b[^:]/i) {
+			WARN("EMAIL_SUBJECT",
+			     "A patch subject line should describe the change not the tool that found it\n" . $herecurr);
+		}
+
 # Check for old stable address
 		if ($line =~ /^\s*cc:\s*.*<?\bstable\@kernel\.org\b>?.*$/i) {
 			ERROR("STABLE_ADDRESS",