[PATCH v3 1/5] Staging: dgnc: dgnc_neo.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

Greg KH gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Dec 21 23:50:23 UTC 2015


On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:10:42PM +0530, Nizam Haider wrote:
> Fix ceckpatch warning

spelling?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh at cdac.in>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> index 8106f52..cf5bfc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static void neo_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
>  		/* Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the FIFO. */
>  		tmp = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->isr_fcr);
>  		if (tmp & 4)
> -			udelay(10);
> +			usleep_range(10, 50);

Where did you get this range from?  Did you make it up?  Please don't.

greg k-h


More information about the devel mailing list