[PATCH v3 1/5] Staging: dgnc: dgnc_neo.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
Greg KH
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Dec 21 23:50:23 UTC 2015
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:10:42PM +0530, Nizam Haider wrote:
> Fix ceckpatch warning
spelling?
>
> Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh at cdac.in>
> ---
> drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> index 8106f52..cf5bfc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static void neo_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
> /* Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the FIFO. */
> tmp = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->isr_fcr);
> if (tmp & 4)
> - udelay(10);
> + usleep_range(10, 50);
Where did you get this range from? Did you make it up? Please don't.
greg k-h
More information about the devel
mailing list