linux-next: Tree for Aug 17 (staging/hfi1)
Marciniszyn, Mike
mike.marciniszyn at intel.com
Tue Aug 18 14:24:32 UTC 2015
> A: these and other similar errors:
>
> In file included from ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c:61:0:
> ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c: In function â__hfi1_trace_LINKVERBâ:
> ../drivers/staging/hfi1/trace.h:1357:20: error: function
> â__hfi1_trace_LINKVERBâ can never be inlined because it uses variable
> argument lists static inline void __hfi1_trace_##fn(const char *func, char
> *fmt, ...) \
>
This was corrected with
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg27221.html, which I think Doug has picked up.
Doug, Randy, Stephen how do we want to handle fixing drivers/staging/hfi1 via the staging list vs. the linux-rdma list?
> B: When CONFIG_PCI is not enabled, lots of these errors:
>
The driver used to get a gift from the drivers/infiniband/hw/Kconfig, which has the required PCI dependency.
The infiniband dependency is also similarly missing and was resolved via the following temporary patch:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg26989.html
This one also needs to be similarly added for that 0-day build issue.
I have submitted to both lists https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg27299.html assuming the above one as a dependency.
> In file included from ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c:60:0:
> ../drivers/staging/hfi1/hfi.h:508:20: error: field âmsixâ has incomplete
> type
> struct msix_entry msix;
> ^
>
> ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c: In function âdisable_intxâ:
> ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c:8667:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> âpci_intxâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> pci_intx(pdev, 0);
> ^
>
> so the driver should depend on PCI or maybe even PCI_MSI.
>
> C. Please provide some contact info, e.g. in a TODO file or the MAINTAINERS
> file.
>
I have submitted https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg27298.html to both lists to add a maintainer.
Mike
More information about the devel
mailing list