[PATCH v3 2/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: move { to previous line

[Chandra Gorentla]

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:11:56PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> Moved the opening brace of code blocks to the previous lines.  This
> fixes the checkpatch.pl error - "that open brace { should be on the
> previous line".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandra S Gorentla <csgorentla at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> index c2ef46f..779ec5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> @@ -1205,8 +1205,7 @@ static int WILC_WFI_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *netdev, u8 k
>  
>  
>  
> -			if (!pairwise)
> -			{
> +			if (!pairwise) {
>  				if (params->cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_TKIP)
>  					u8gmode = ENCRYPT_ENABLED | WPA | TKIP;
>  				else
> @@ -1304,8 +1303,7 @@ static int WILC_WFI_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *netdev, u8 k
>  
>  		{
>  			u8mode = 0;
> -			if (!pairwise)
> -			{
> +			if (!pairwise) {
>  				if (params->key_len > 16 && params->cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_TKIP) {
>  					/* swap the tx mic by rx mic */
>  					pu8RxMic = params->key + 24;
> @@ -1531,8 +1529,7 @@ static int WILC_WFI_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *netdev, u8 k
>  	priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
>  
>  
> -	if (!pairwise)
> -	{
> +	if (!pairwise) {
>  		PRINT_D(CFG80211_DBG, "Getting group key idx: %x\n", key_index);
>  
>  		key_params.key = priv->wilc_gtk[key_index]->key;
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

Hello Greg, 
 
I sent 3 patches in this series.  The subject lines of other 2 are -
 
[PATCH v3 3/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: remove space after '('
[PATCH v3 1/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: use 'void' for no arguments
functions

These two patches (1/3 and 3/3) were accepted but not the patch (2/3) in this 
mail.  Any reason for not accepting?  Is any thing wrong with this patch - 2/3?
If so, I can correct and send again.

Thanks,
chandra