[PATCH] staging: unisys: use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset 0

DaeSeok Youn daeseok.youn at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 01:04:40 UTC 2014


oh...
You didn't get my reply about vmalloc usage.

My replay attach again, below.

> 2014-03-18 9:37 GMT+09:00 Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>:
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:26:07AM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
>>> I think vmalloc/kmalloc in uislib_malloc() can be removed and just use
>>> vmalloc/kmalloc directly.
>>
>> Yes.  Actually, just use kmalloc, I don't knwo why vmalloc is being
>> used, but cc: the driver maintainers just to be sure.
>
Here, need to check by you.
> It try to allocate 128KiB(131072byte) with vmalloc(). I think if it
> trying to allocate with kmalloc()
> it has a possibility to fail because of memory fragmentation even if
> system has enough memory to use.
> Just my opinion. If I'm wrong, let me know.
>
>>
>>> (UISMALLOC() macro is also removed.)
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> And uislib_malloc() is renamed to "uislib_trace_buffer_status()" which
>>> is just tracing buffer status(Malloc_FailuresAlloc, Malloc_BytesInUse
>>> ...) for info_proc_read_helper().
>>
>> The whole tracing stuff needs to be ripped out, so no problem deleting
>> it here as well.
>
> OK. I will remove that information in info_proc_read_helper().
>
>>
>>> If this change is accepted, it also need to change uislib_free().
>>
>> Drop it and just use kfree().
> OK. replace kfree() with uislib_free().
>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h

2014-03-19 9:58 GMT+09:00 Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:03:49AM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
>> Hi, greg.
>>
>> Review my comment below.
>
> What comment?
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h-


More information about the devel mailing list