[PATCH 3/5] staging/wlags49_h2: correct check of the return value of register_netdev()

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:50:51PM +0200, Stephan Gabert wrote:
> As mentioned in net/core/dev.c register_netdev() explicitly returns a
> negative errno code on failure.
> 
> So in case of failure, one should rather test whether ret is negative
> than just unlike 0.

No.  In the kernel the normal way is to say:

	if (ret)
		return ret;

Zero is succes and non-zero is error code.

	if (ret != 0)
		return ret;

That's a double negative and pointlessly confusing.

	if (ret != 0 != 0 != 0)

That's a hextuple negative and awesomely confusing.

There are times where a double negative is ok.  When you are talking
about numbers specifically:

	if (ret != 0 && ret != 3) {

That means ret is not zero or three, but zero doesn't mean success or
failure, it's just a number.

For strcmp() functions you should always compare against zero
because that is the idiom.

	if (strcmp(foo, bar) < 0)
	if (strcmp(foo, bar) != 0)

The first "<" means "foo" is before "bar" and "!=" means not equal.

	if (ret < 0)
		return ret;

Probably means that now ret is either zero or a positive value???  It is
ambiguous.

regards,
dan carpenter