[PATCHv2] staging: media: as102: replace custom dprintk() with dev_dbg()
Joe Perches
joe at perches.com
Mon Aug 4 11:12:12 UTC 2014
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 12:17:14PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
[]
> > + if (dev) {
> > + dev_dbg(&dev->bus_adap.usb_dev->dev,
> > + "tuner parameters: freq: %d bw: 0x%02x gi: 0x%02x\n",
> > + params->frequency,
> > + tune_args->bandwidth,
> > + tune_args->guard_interval);
> > + } else {
> > + pr_debug("as102: tuner parameters: freq: %d bw: 0x%02x gi: 0x%02x\n",
> > params->frequency,
> > tune_args->bandwidth,
> > tune_args->guard_interval);
> > + }
[]
> This isn't indented correctly. I wish checkpatch.pl would catch that...
> Anyway, the else side can be removed as explained earlier.
checkpatch doesn't warn on any of:
$ cat t.c
static int func(void **bar)
{
bool b;
/* test */
int a[2] = {
3,
6
};
if (b) {
b = a[0] == a[1];
}
return a[b];
}
$
I think it'd be better if it would one day
but it doesn't seem as simple as it seems
for checkpatch to do it.
More information about the devel
mailing list