[PATCH] staging: visorchipset: fix sparse warnings about static declaration
Greg Kroah-Hartman
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Aug 1 08:15:37 UTC 2014
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Some functions were prototyped as static but the actual definition
> wasn't. While this is valid (the function is static because the two
> declarations don't conflict and the first one is static), this makes
> sparse unhappy and cause confusion of normal people too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat <vincent at bernat.im>
> ---
> .../unisys/visorchipset/visorchipset_main.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
This no longer applies cleanly to my tree, can you please refresh it and
resend so that I can apply it?
thanks,
greg k-h
More information about the devel
mailing list