Staging: dgap: RFC

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:07:12AM -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> The latest staging tree based on 3.15-rc1 has revealed a bug that I
> introduced into the dgap driver way back. Various oops occur when
> loading and unloading the driver multiple times in succession. The oops
> never actually indicate anything dgap driver related. When I send a
> patch to fix the problem, since the oops is rarely the same, do I need
> to include an oops message with my patch or should I just indicate
> "various oops"?

These things are not hard and fast rules.  Do whatever makes sense.
Give reporter credit if anyone else discovered it.

regards,
dan carpenter