Staging: dgap: RFC

[Mark Hounschell]

The latest staging tree based on 3.15-rc1 has revealed a bug that I
introduced into the dgap driver way back. Various oops occur when
loading and unloading the driver multiple times in succession. The oops
never actually indicate anything dgap driver related. When I send a
patch to fix the problem, since the oops is rarely the same, do I need
to include an oops message with my patch or should I just indicate
"various oops"?

Thanks
Mark