[PATCH 4/4] staging: ste_rmi4: Suppress 'ignoring return value of ‘regulator_enable()' warning

Srinidhi Kasagar srinidhi.kasagar at stericsson.com
Fri May 3 07:07:14 UTC 2013


On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 17:48:10 +0200, Lee Jones wrote:
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c:
>         In function ‘synaptics_rmi4_resume’:
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c:1090:18:
>         warning: ignoring return value of ‘regulator_enable’, declared
>         with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result
> 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> index fe667dd..c4d013d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> @@ -1087,7 +1087,9 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	unsigned char intr_status;
>  	struct synaptics_rmi4_data *rmi4_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> -	regulator_enable(rmi4_data->regulator);
> +	retval = regulator_enable(rmi4_data->regulator);
> +	if (retval < 0)
> +		return retval;
Does it make sense to add a dev_err?


Otherwise, you can add my
Acked-by:srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar at stericsson.com> for this series.

>  
>  	enable_irq(rmi4_data->i2c_client->irq);
>  	rmi4_data->touch_stopped = false;
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 



More information about the devel mailing list