[PATCH next] zram: __zram_reset_device() can be static

[Minchan Kim]

Hi Greg,

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:47:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hi Fengguang,
>
> Please don't top-post.
>
>> Greg said he doesn't accept any z* friends patches in staging excpet
>> plain bug fix and promotion patches until promotion is done.
>
> This is a bugfix, why shouldn't I take it?

I am really welcome if you accept the patch for zram.
But I saw you said to Dan that you don't accept zsmalloc, zram and
zcache patches
any more unless the patch is obvious bug fix or for promoting it.
So I am really confused about the criteria of bugfix you have thought
because I thought
Fengguang's patch is clean-up patch so I just meant to help you.
I believe obvious bug fix is things to make trouble without it in real
practice, NOT imagine as if stable_kernel_rules.txt said.

I am Ccing z* stuff friends because they should know about it exactly
so that we can't bother you any more.

Thanks.
>
>> The zram promotion would be very simple if we fisinish promoting
>> zsmalloc, which seth is already trying it with Nitin and me. Because
>> Jens already acked for zram promotion.
>>
>> So could you resend it after zram promotion is done?
>
> When is that going to happen?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim