[PATCH 4/4] staging: ozwpan: Create deferred work to destroy PD object.
Rupesh Gujare
rupesh.gujare at atmel.com
Fri Aug 23 10:38:01 UTC 2013
On 22/08/13 18:45, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> +void oz_pd_destroy(struct oz_pd *pd)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (hrtimer_active(&pd->timeout))
>> + hrtimer_cancel(&pd->timeout);
>> + if (hrtimer_active(&pd->heartbeat))
>> + hrtimer_cancel(&pd->heartbeat);
>> +
>> + memset(&pd->workitem, 0, sizeof(pd->workitem));
>> + INIT_WORK(&pd->workitem, oz_pd_free);
>
> Hm, memset(), then INIT_WORK()? Is memset() necessary?
Opps.. you are right, I think we don't need memset() here.
>
>> + ret = schedule_work(&pd->workitem);
>> +
>
> Don't think empty line is needed here.
Yes, I agree. I will send follow on patches to fix this, as original
patches had already been applied by Greg.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + oz_pd_dbg(pd, ON, "failed to schedule workitem\n");
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> * Context: softirq-serialized
>> */
>> int oz_services_start(struct oz_pd *pd, u16 apps, int resume)
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.h
>> b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.h
>> index 996ef65..12c7129 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.h
>> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct oz_pd {
>> u8 timeout_type;
>> struct tasklet_struct heartbeat_tasklet;
>> struct tasklet_struct timeout_tasklet;
>> + struct work_struct workitem;
>
> Er, other field names seem aligned, what about this one?
>
After applying patch, it looks all right to me.
--
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare
More information about the devel
mailing list