[PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11:55PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh at linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:40 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: apw at canonical.com; devel at linuxdriverproject.org;
> > virtualization at lists.osdl.org; ohering at suse.com; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:29:49AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh at linuxfoundation.org]
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:26 AM
> > > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > > Cc: apw at canonical.com; devel at linuxdriverproject.org; ohering at suse.com;
> > > > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; virtualization at lists.osdl.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > > Are you still missing it; do you want me to resend the whole set?
> > > >
> > > > Nope, it showed up a few hours later, thanks.  You really should get
> > > > that fixed...
> > >
> > > Greg, some additional testing with VM replication on Windows Server
> > > 2012 has revealed some issues with this patch-set. Please drop the
> > > patch set, I will  fix the problem and resend it.
> > 
> > Thanks for letting me know, now dropped.
> > 
> > But, for the next round, I suggest you run this patchset by the netdev
> > developers, as I think you are doing things in an "odd" way for some of
> > the ip determination.
> 
> Will do. Just curious;  can you be more explicit on what part appeared "odd"
> to you.

The fact that it was Red Hat specific was the main part, this should be
done in a standard way, with standard tools, right?

greg k-h