[PATCH v2] staging/ccg: Allow to overwrite composite's setup function

[Michal Nazarewicz]

> On 08/20/2012 01:47 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> Would it make sense to instead of doing that, wrap composite_setup() and
>> composite_disconnect() inside ifdef and make ccg.c define those two
>> functions?

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy at linutronix.de> writes:
> I hoped you suggest to move ccg's dependencies into staging.
> Why would want to move the ifdef into composite?  ccg calls both
> functions so it would give two ifdefs instead one central and I think
> it would get more ugly.

Ah, sorry, disregard my comment.  I've misread the ccg.c code.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn at google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/attachments/20120820/503b6141/attachment.asc>