[PATCH NEXT]staging: rtl8192u Fix typos.
Jesper Juhl
jj at chaosbits.net
Mon Apr 30 20:41:03 UTC 2012
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock at gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock at gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> The below patch fixes some typos that I found while going through staging/rtl8192u
>
I think it needs a little more work - see below.
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h | 6 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 50 ++++++++++++------------
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c | 8 ++--
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c | 8 ++--
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c | 16 ++++----
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h | 2 +-
> 13 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c
> index 8878cfe..0e8ff75 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>
> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver.
>
> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> project Authors.
I believe this would be better like this:
We want to thank the authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
project authors.
> */
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h
> index fb3ac97..3527d32 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> Parts of this driver are based on the rtl8180 driver skeleton from Patric Schenke & Andres Salomon
> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver
>
> - We want to tanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
> + We want to thanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
Same comment as above "We want to thank .." rather than "We want to
thanks ..". And "authors" rather than "Authors".
> */
>
> /*This files contains card eeprom (93c46 or 93c56) programming routines*/
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h
> index 43d459d..adeb724 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>
> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver
>
> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> project Authors.
Same comment as above.
> */
>
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ do { if(rt_global_debug_component & component) \
> #define COMP_INIT BIT2 // during driver initialization / halt / reset.
>
>
> -#define COMP_RECV BIT3 // Reveive part data path.
> +#define COMP_RECV BIT3 // Revive part data path.
Are you sure that "Receive data path." is not what was intended here?
> #define COMP_SEND BIT4 // Send part path.
> #define COMP_IO BIT5 // I/O Related. Added by Annie, 2006-03-02.
> #define COMP_POWER BIT6 // 802.11 Power Save mode or System/Device Power state related.
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ typedef struct _tx_fwinfo_819x_usb {
> u8 TxSubCarrier:2; // This is used for legacy OFDM rate only.
> u8 STBC:2;
> u8 AllowAggregation:1;
> - u8 RtsHT:1; //Interpre RtsRate field as high throughput data rate
> + u8 RtsHT:1; //Interprete RtsRate field as high throughput data rate
I believe this should be "Interpret RtsRate field as high throughput data rate".
> u8 RtsShort:1; //Short PLCP for CCK, or short GI for 11n MCS
> u8 RtsBandwidth:1; // This is used for HT MCS rate only.
> u8 RtsSubcarrier:2; // This is used for legacy OFDM rate only.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> index 9c00865..be86045 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void rtl819x_set_channel_map(u8 channel_plan, struct r8192_priv* priv)
> {
> Dot11d_Init(ieee);
> ieee->bGlobalDomain = false;
> - //acturally 8225 & 8256 rf chip only support B,G,24N mode
> + //actually 8225 & 8256 rf chip only support B,G,24N mode
"chip" is singular, but here there are two of them (8225 & 8256) so I
believe you should use the plural "chips".
> if ((priv->rf_chip == RF_8225) || (priv->rf_chip == RF_8256))
> {
> min_chan = 1;
> @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ inline u16 rtl8192_rate2rate(short rate)
> }
>
>
> -/* The protype of rx_isr has changed since one verion of Linux Kernel */
> +/* The prototype of rx_isr has changed since one version of Linux Kernel */
Can't argue with the correction of the spelling of "prototype" but, while
you are at it, why not fix the entire sentence? "has changed since one
version of the Linux kernel" - what does that really mean? If you don't
know either then I'm fine with just leaving it to the spelling fix :-)
> static void rtl8192_rx_isr(struct urb *urb)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *) urb->context;
> @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static void rtl8192_tx_isr(struct urb *tx_urb)
> if(tcb_desc->queue_index != TXCMD_QUEUE) {
> if(tx_urb->status == 0) {
> dev->trans_start = jiffies;
> - // As act as station mode, destion shall be unicast address.
> + // As act as station mode, destination shall be unicast address.
Perhaps "// Act as station mode, destination shall ..." ?
> //priv->ieee80211->stats.tx_bytes+=(skb->len - priv->ieee80211->tx_headroom);
> //priv->ieee80211->stats.tx_packets++;
> priv->stats.txoktotal++;
> @@ -1522,13 +1522,13 @@ static void rtl8192_tx_isr(struct urb *tx_urb)
> else if ((skb_queue_len(&priv->ieee80211->skb_drv_aggQ[queue_index])!= 0)&&\
> (!(priv->ieee80211->queue_stop))) {
> // Tx Driver Aggregation process
> - /* The driver will aggregation the packets according to the following stets
> + /* The driver will aggregation the packets according to the following stats
> * 1. check whether there's tx irq available, for it's a completion return
> * function, it should contain enough tx irq;
> - * 2. check pakcet type;
> + * 2. check packet type;
> * 3. initialize sendlist, check whether the to-be send packet no greater than 1
> - * 4. aggregation the packets, and fill firmware info and tx desc to it, etc.
> - * 5. check whehter the packet could be sent, otherwise just insert to wait head
> + * 4. aggregates the packets, and fill firmware info and tx desc to it, etc.
"... and fill firmware info and tx desc into it ..." perhaps?
> + * 5. check whether the packet could be sent, otherwise just insert to wait head
"... insert into wait head" perhaps?
> * */
> skb = skb_dequeue(&priv->ieee80211->skb_drv_aggQ[queue_index]);
> if(!check_nic_enough_desc(dev, queue_index)) {
> @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static int rtl8192_qos_handle_probe_response(struct r8192_priv *priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* handle manage frame frame beacon and probe response */
> +/* handle and manage frame from beacon and probe response */
> static int rtl8192_handle_beacon(struct net_device * dev,
> struct ieee80211_beacon * beacon,
> struct ieee80211_network * network)
> @@ -2625,7 +2625,7 @@ bool GetHalfNmodeSupportByAPs819xUsb(struct net_device* dev)
> void rtl8192_refresh_supportrate(struct r8192_priv* priv)
> {
> struct ieee80211_device* ieee = priv->ieee80211;
> - //we donot consider set support rate for ABG mode, only HT MCS rate is set here.
> + //we do not consider set support rate for ABG mode, only HT MCS rate is set here.
> if (ieee->mode == WIRELESS_MODE_N_24G || ieee->mode == WIRELESS_MODE_N_5G)
> {
> memcpy(ieee->Regdot11HTOperationalRateSet, ieee->RegHTSuppRateSet, 16);
> @@ -2780,10 +2780,10 @@ static void rtl8192_init_priv_variable(struct net_device* dev)
> priv->TransmitConfig =
> // TCR_DurProcMode | //for RTL8185B, duration setting by HW
> //? TCR_DISReqQsize |
> - (TCR_MXDMA_2048<<TCR_MXDMA_OFFSET)| // Max DMA Burst Size per Tx DMA Burst, 7: reservied.
> + (TCR_MXDMA_2048<<TCR_MXDMA_OFFSET)| // Max DMA Burst Size per Tx DMA Burst, 7: reserved.
> (priv->ShortRetryLimit<<TCR_SRL_OFFSET)| // Short retry limit
> (priv->LongRetryLimit<<TCR_LRL_OFFSET) | // Long retry limit
> - (false ? TCR_SAT: 0); // FALSE: HW provies PLCP length and LENGEXT, TURE: SW proiveds them
> + (false ? TCR_SAT: 0); // FALSE: HW provides PLCP length and LENGEXT, TURE: SW provides them
I believe "TURE" wants to be changed to "TRUE".
> #ifdef TO_DO_LIST
> if(Adapter->bInHctTest)
> pHalData->ReceiveConfig = pHalData->CSMethod |
> @@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ if(Adapter->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_NORESET)
> { // User disable RF via registry.
> RT_TRACE((COMP_INIT|COMP_RF), DBG_LOUD, ("InitializeAdapter819xUsb(): Turn off RF for RegRfOff ----------\n"));
> MgntActSet_RF_State(Adapter, eRfOff, RF_CHANGE_BY_SW);
> - // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because off the same state
> + // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because of the same state
Shouldn't this be "Those actions" (plural) rather than "Those action" ?
> for(eRFPath = 0; eRFPath <pHalData->NumTotalRFPath; eRFPath++)
> PHY_SetRFReg(Adapter, (RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)eRFPath, 0x4, 0xC00, 0x0);
> }
> @@ -3458,7 +3458,7 @@ if(Adapter->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_NORESET)
> if(pHalData->eRFPowerState == eRfOff)
> {
> MgntActSet_RF_State(Adapter, eRfOff, pMgntInfo->RfOffReason);
> - // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because off the same state
> + // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because of the same state
Same comment as above.
> for(eRFPath = 0; eRFPath <pHalData->NumTotalRFPath; eRFPath++)
> PHY_SetRFReg(Adapter, (RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)eRFPath, 0x4, 0xC00, 0x0);
> }
> @@ -3586,7 +3586,7 @@ TxCheckStuck(struct net_device *dev)
> //unsigned long flags;
>
> //
> - // Decide Stuch threshold according to current power save mode
> + // Decide such threshold according to current power save mode
> //
>
> // RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET, " ==> TxCheckStuck()\n");
> @@ -3745,7 +3745,7 @@ rtl819x_ifcheck_resetornot(struct net_device *dev)
>
> // Driver should not check RX stuck in IBSS mode because it is required to
> // set Check BSSID in order to send beacon, however, if check BSSID is
> - // set, STA cannot hear any packet a all. Emily, 2008.04.12
> + // set, STA cannot hear any packet at all. Emily, 2008.04.12
> RxResetType = RxCheckStuck(dev);
> }
> if(TxResetType==RESET_TYPE_NORMAL || RxResetType==RESET_TYPE_NORMAL)
> @@ -3962,7 +3962,7 @@ RESET_START:
> up(&priv->wx_sem);
> RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():<==========down process is finished\n",__FUNCTION__);
> //rtl8192_irq_disable(dev);
> - RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():===========>start to up the driver\n",__FUNCTION__);
> + RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():===========>start up the driver\n",__FUNCTION__);
> reset_status = _rtl8192_up(dev);
>
> RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():<===========up process is finished\n",__FUNCTION__);
> @@ -4155,7 +4155,7 @@ extern void rtl819x_watchdog_wqcallback(struct work_struct *work)
> void watch_dog_timer_callback(unsigned long data)
> {
> struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv((struct net_device *) data);
> - //printk("===============>watch_dog timer\n");
> + //printk("===============>watch_dog timer\n");
> queue_delayed_work(priv->priv_wq,&priv->watch_dog_wq, 0);
> mod_timer(&priv->watch_dog_timer, jiffies + MSECS(IEEE80211_WATCH_DOG_TIME));
> }
> @@ -4170,7 +4170,7 @@ int _rtl8192_up(struct net_device *dev)
> init_status = rtl8192_adapter_start(dev);
> if(!init_status)
> {
> - RT_TRACE(COMP_ERR,"ERR!!! %s(): initialization is failed!\n", __FUNCTION__);
> + RT_TRACE(COMP_ERR,"ERR!!! %s(): initialization failed!\n", __FUNCTION__);
> priv->up=priv->ieee80211->ieee_up = 0;
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
> @@ -4256,7 +4256,7 @@ int rtl8192_down(struct net_device *dev)
> skb_queue_purge(&priv->ieee80211->skb_drv_aggQ [i]);
> }
>
> - //as cancel_delayed_work will del work->timer, so if work is not definedas struct delayed_work, it will corrupt
> + //as cancel_delayed_work will del work->timer, so if work is not defined as struct delayed_work, it will corrupt
> // flush_scheduled_work();
> rtl8192_cancel_deferred_work(priv);
> deinit_hal_dm(dev);
> @@ -4516,7 +4516,7 @@ u8 HwRateToMRate90(bool bIsHT, u8 rate)
>
> /**
> * Function: UpdateRxPktTimeStamp
> - * Overview: Recored down the TSF time stamp when receiving a packet
> + * Overview: Record down the TSF time stamp when receiving a packet
Why not just "Record the TSF time stamp ..." ?
> *
> * Input:
> * PADAPTER Adapter
> @@ -4556,9 +4556,9 @@ long rtl819x_translate_todbm(u8 signal_strength_index )// 0-100 index.
> }
>
>
> -/* 2008/01/22 MH We can not delcare RSSI/EVM total value of sliding window to
> +/* 2008/01/22 MH We can not declare RSSI/EVM total value of sliding window to
> be a local static. Otherwise, it may increase when we return from S3/S4. The
> - value will be kept in memory or disk. We must delcare the value in adapter
> + value will be kept in memory or disk. We must declare the value in adapter
Shouldn't it be "declare the value in the ...".
And shouldn't it be "adaptor" rather than "adapter"? Since an "adaptor" is
a device and "adapter" is a person who's able to adapt.
> and it will be reinitialized when return from S3/S4. */
> void rtl8192_process_phyinfo(struct r8192_priv * priv,u8* buffer, struct ieee80211_rx_stats * pprevious_stats, struct ieee80211_rx_stats * pcurrent_stats)
> {
> @@ -5091,7 +5091,7 @@ static void rtl8192_query_rxphystatus(
> tmp_rxevm = pofdm_buf->rxevm_X[i];
> rx_evmX = (char)(tmp_rxevm);
>
> - // Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX >>= 1" because the compilor of free build environment
> + // Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX >>= 1" because the compiler of free build environment
> // fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing shifting operation which may change a negative
"fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing..." sounds a bit broken to
me (but I could be wrong). I would have corrected this to "will set the
most significant bit to "zero" when doing ..."
Better or??
> // value to positive one, then the dbm value (which is supposed to be negative) is not correct anymore.
> rx_evmX /= 2; //dbm
> @@ -5171,7 +5171,7 @@ void TranslateRxSignalStuff819xUsb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> type = WLAN_FC_GET_TYPE(fc);
> praddr = hdr->addr1;
>
> - /* Check if the received packet is acceptabe. */
> + /* Check if the received packet is acceptable. */
> bpacket_match_bssid = ((IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL != type) &&
> (eqMacAddr(priv->ieee80211->current_network.bssid, (fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_TODS)? hdr->addr1 : (fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS )? hdr->addr2 : hdr->addr3))
> && (!pstats->bHwError) && (!pstats->bCRC)&& (!pstats->bICV));
> @@ -5211,7 +5211,7 @@ void TranslateRxSignalStuff819xUsb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> /**
> * Function: UpdateReceivedRateHistogramStatistics
> -* Overview: Recored down the received data rate
> +* Overview: Record down the received data rate
What about just "Record the received data rate".
> *
> * Input:
> * struct net_device *dev
> @@ -5401,7 +5401,7 @@ void query_rxdesc_status(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_rx_stats *stats,
> }
>
> #ifdef USB_RX_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT
> - /* for the rx aggregated sub frame, the redundant space truelly contained in the packet */
> + /* for the rx aggregated sub frame, the redundant space truly contained in the packet */
> if(bIsRxAggrSubframe) {
> skb_pull(skb, 8);
> }
> @@ -5480,7 +5480,7 @@ void rtl8192_rx_nomal(struct sk_buff* skb)
> PacketShiftBytes = GetRxPacketShiftBytes819xUsb(&stats, false);
> }
> #endif
> - /* Process the MPDU recevied */
> + /* Process the MPDU received */
> skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 4/*sCrcLng*/);
>
> rx_pkt_len = skb->len;
> @@ -5538,7 +5538,7 @@ void rtl8192_rx_nomal(struct sk_buff* skb)
> if(PacketLength > agg_skb->len) {
> break;
> }
> - /* Process the MPDU recevied */
> + /* Process the MPDU received */
> skb = dev_alloc_skb(PacketLength);
> memcpy(skb_put(skb,PacketLength),agg_skb->data, PacketLength);
> skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 4/*sCrcLng*/);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
> index 2dde9fa..3f79e61 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static u32 edca_setting_UL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] =
> /*------------------------Define global variable-----------------------------*/
> // Debug variable ?
> dig_t dm_digtable;
> -// Store current shoftware write register content for MAC PHY.
> +// Store current software write register content for MAC PHY.
> u8 dm_shadow[16][256] = {{0}};
> // For Dynamic Rx Path Selection by Signal Strength
> DRxPathSel DM_RxPathSelTable;
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void dm_pd_th(struct net_device *dev);
> static void dm_cs_ratio(struct net_device *dev);
>
> static void dm_init_ctstoself(struct net_device *dev);
> -// DM --> EDCA turboe mode control
> +// DM --> EDCA turbo mode control
> static void dm_check_edca_turbo(struct net_device *dev);
>
> // DM --> HW RF control
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ extern void init_rate_adaptive(struct net_device * dev)
> *
> * Revised History:
> * When Who Remark
> - * 05/26/08 amy Create version 0 proting from windows code.
> + * 05/26/08 amy Create version 0 porting from windows code.
> *
> *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> static void dm_check_rate_adaptive(struct net_device * dev)
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static u32 OFDMSwingTable[OFDM_Table_Length] = {
> 0x5a400169, // 3, +3db
> 0x50800142, // 4, +2db
> 0x47c0011f, // 5, +1db
> - 0x40000100, // 6, +0db ===> default, upper for higher temprature, lower for low temprature
> + 0x40000100, // 6, +0db ===> default, upper for higher temperature, lower for low temperature
> 0x390000e4, // 7, -1db
> 0x32c000cb, // 8, -2db
> 0x2d4000b5, // 9, -3db
> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void dm_TXPowerTrackingCallback_TSSI(struct net_device * dev)
> {
> write_nic_byte(dev, 0x1ba, 0);
> viviflag = FALSE;
> - RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "we filted this data\n");
> + RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "we filtered the data\n");
> for(k = 0;k < 5; k++)
> tmp_report[k] = 0;
> break;
> @@ -864,14 +864,14 @@ static void dm_TXPowerTrackingCallback_ThermalMeter(struct net_device * dev)
> RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "Readback ThermalMeterA = %d \n", tmpRegA);
> if(tmpRegA < 3 || tmpRegA > 13)
> return;
> - if(tmpRegA >= 12) // if over 12, TP will be bad when high temprature
> + if(tmpRegA >= 12) // if over 12, TP will be bad when high temperature
> tmpRegA = 12;
> RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "Valid ThermalMeterA = %d \n", tmpRegA);
> priv->ThermalMeter[0] = ThermalMeterVal; //We use fixed value by Bryant's suggestion
> priv->ThermalMeter[1] = ThermalMeterVal; //We use fixed value by Bryant's suggestion
>
> - //Get current RF-A temprature index
> - if(priv->ThermalMeter[0] >= (u8)tmpRegA) //lower temprature
> + //Get current RF-A temperature index
> + if(priv->ThermalMeter[0] >= (u8)tmpRegA) //lower temperature
> {
> tmpOFDMindex = tmpCCK20Mindex = 6+(priv->ThermalMeter[0]-(u8)tmpRegA);
> tmpCCK40Mindex = tmpCCK20Mindex - 6;
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static void dm_TXPowerTrackingCallback_ThermalMeter(struct net_device * dev)
> else
> {
> tmpval = ((u8)tmpRegA - priv->ThermalMeter[0]);
> - if(tmpval >= 6) // higher temprature
> + if(tmpval >= 6) // higher temperature
> tmpOFDMindex = tmpCCK20Mindex = 0; // max to +6dB
> else
> tmpOFDMindex = tmpCCK20Mindex = 6 - tmpval;
> @@ -1457,9 +1457,9 @@ static void dm_InitializeTXPowerTracking_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
>
> - // Tx Power tracking by Theremal Meter require Firmware R/W 3-wire. This mechanism
> + // Tx Power tracking by Thermal Meter require Firmware R/W 3-wire. This mechanism
Shouldn't this be "requires" rather than "require" ?
No argument about the Theremal-->Thermal change :)
> // can be enabled only when Firmware R/W 3-wire is enabled. Otherwise, frequent r/w
> - // 3-wire by driver cause RF goes into wrong state.
> + // 3-wire by driver causes RF to go into a wrong state.
> if(priv->ieee80211->FwRWRF)
> priv->btxpower_tracking = TRUE;
> else
> @@ -1520,7 +1520,7 @@ static void dm_CheckTXPowerTracking_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev)
>
> if(!TM_Trigger)
> {
> - //Attention!! You have to wirte all 12bits data to RF, or it may cause RF to crash
> + //Attention!! You have to write all 12bits data to RF, or it may cause RF to crash
How about "... all 12 bits of data ..." ?
> //actually write reg0x02 bit1=0, then bit1=1.
> //DbgPrint("Trigger ThermalMeter, write RF reg0x2 = 0x4d to 0x4f\n");
> rtl8192_phy_SetRFReg(dev, RF90_PATH_A, 0x02, bMask12Bits, 0x4d);
> @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ extern void dm_restore_dynamic_mechanism_state(struct net_device *dev)
> write_nic_dword(dev, RATR0, ratr_value);
> write_nic_byte(dev, UFWP, 1);
> }
> - //Resore TX Power Tracking Index
> + //Restore TX Power Tracking Index
> if(priv->btxpower_trackingInit && priv->btxpower_tracking){
> dm_txpower_reset_recovery(dev);
> }
> @@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ static void dm_dig_init(struct net_device *dev)
> dm_digtable.dbg_mode = DM_DBG_OFF; //off=by real rssi value, on=by DM_DigTable.Rssi_val for new dig
> dm_digtable.dig_algorithm_switch = 0;
>
> - /* 2007/10/04 MH Define init gain threshol. */
> + /* 2007/10/04 MH Define init gain threshold. */
> dm_digtable.dig_state = DM_STA_DIG_MAX;
> dm_digtable.dig_highpwr_state = DM_STA_DIG_MAX;
> dm_digtable.initialgain_lowerbound_state = false;
> @@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_by_driverrssi(
> return;
>
> //DbgPrint("Dig by Sw Rssi \n");
> - if(dm_digtable.dig_algorithm_switch) // if swithed algorithm, we have to disable FW Dig.
> + if(dm_digtable.dig_algorithm_switch) // if switched algorithm, we have to disable FW Dig.
> fw_dig = 0;
> if(fw_dig <= 3) // execute several times to make sure the FW Dig is disabled
> {// FW DIG Off
> @@ -2160,7 +2160,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_by_fwfalse_alarm(
> /*DbgPrint("DIG Check\n\r RSSI=%d LOW=%d HIGH=%d STATE=%d",
> pHalData->UndecoratedSmoothedPWDB, DM_DigTable.RssiLowThresh,
> DM_DigTable.RssiHighThresh, DM_DigTable.Dig_State);*/
> - /* 1. When RSSI decrease, We have to judge if it is smaller than a treshold
> + /* 1. When RSSI decrease, We have to judge if it is smaller than a threshold
> and then execute below step. */
> if ((priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb <= dm_digtable.rssi_low_thresh))
> {
> @@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_by_fwfalse_alarm(
>
> }
>
> - /* 2. When RSSI increase, We have to judge if it is larger than a treshold
> + /* 2. When RSSI increase, We have to judge if it is larger than a threshold
> and then execute below step. */
> if ((priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb >= dm_digtable.rssi_high_thresh) )
> {
> @@ -2329,7 +2329,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_highpwr(
> }
>
> /* 3. When RSSI >75% or <70%, it is a high power issue. We have to judge if
> - it is larger than a treshold and then execute below step. */
> + it is larger than a threshold and then execute below step. */
"the step below" rather than "below step"? (also seen above).
> // 2008/02/05 MH SD3-Jerry Modify PD_TH for high power issue.
> if (priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb >= dm_digtable.rssi_high_power_highthresh)
> {
> @@ -2841,8 +2841,8 @@ static void dm_check_rfctrl_gpio(struct net_device * dev)
> {
> //struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
>
> - // Walk around for DTM test, we will not enable HW - radio on/off because r/w
> - // page 1 register before Lextra bus is enabled cause system fails when resuming
> + // Work around for DTM test, we will not enable HW - radio on/off because r/w
> + // page 1 register before extra bus is enabled causing system fails when resuming
"system failure" or "system failures" rather than "system fails" perhaps?
> // from S4. 20080218, Emily
>
> // Stop to execute workitem to prevent S3/S4 bug.
> @@ -3377,13 +3377,13 @@ extern void dm_fsync_timer_callback(unsigned long data)
> {
>
> u32 DiffNum = priv->rateCountDiffRecord - rate_count_diff;
> - // Contiune count
> + // Continue count
> if(DiffNum >= priv->ieee80211->fsync_seconddiff_ratethreshold)
> priv->ContiuneDiffCount++;
> else
> priv->ContiuneDiffCount = 0;
>
> - // Contiune count over
> + // Continue count over
> if(priv->ContiuneDiffCount >=2)
> {
> bSwitchFromCountDiff = true;
> @@ -3392,7 +3392,7 @@ extern void dm_fsync_timer_callback(unsigned long data)
> }
> else
> {
> - // Stop contiune count
> + // Stop continue count
"Stop counting" ?
> priv->ContiuneDiffCount = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3523,7 +3523,7 @@ static void dm_StartSWFsync(struct net_device *dev)
> RT_TRACE(COMP_HALDM,"%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
> // Initial rate record to zero, start to record.
> priv->rate_record = 0;
> - // Initial contiune diff count to zero, start to record.
> + // Initial continue diff count to zero, start to record.
How about "// Initialize continue diff count to zero, start to record."
> priv->ContiuneDiffCount = 0;
"Continue" is misspelled in this variable name as well - that ought to
also be fixed IMHO.
> priv->rateCountDiffRecord = 0;
> priv->bswitch_fsync = false;
> @@ -3875,7 +3875,7 @@ static void dm_send_rssi_tofw(struct net_device *dev)
>
> // If we test chariot, we should stop the TX command ?
> // Because 92E will always silent reset when we send tx command. We use register
> - // 0x1e0(byte) to botify driver.
> + // 0x1e0(byte) to notify driver.
> write_nic_byte(dev, DRIVER_RSSI, (u8)priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb);
> return;
> tx_cmd.Op = TXCMD_SET_RX_RSSI;
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
> index e89aaf7..b0ee4dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless
> 2100 GPL driver.
>
> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects
> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects
"We want to thank the authors ..."
> and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
> */
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c
> index 981de9b..2ce0fc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>
> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver.
>
> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> project Authors.
Same comment as above.
> */
>
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int r8192_wx_get_ap_status(struct net_device *dev,
> //count the length of input ssid
> for(name_len=0 ; ((char*)wrqu->data.pointer)[name_len]!='\0' ; name_len++);
>
> - //search for the correspoding info which is received
> + //search for the corresponding info which is received
> list_for_each_entry(target, &ieee->network_list, list) {
> if ( (target->ssid_len == name_len) &&
> (strncmp(target->ssid, (char*)wrqu->data.pointer, name_len)==0)){
> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int rtl8180_wx_get_range(struct net_device *dev,
> range->max_qual.updated = 7; /* Updated all three */
>
> range->avg_qual.qual = 92; /* > 8% missed beacons is 'bad' */
> - /* TODO: Find real 'good' to 'bad' threshol value for RSSI */
> + /* TODO: Find real 'good' to 'bad' threshold value for RSSI */
> range->avg_qual.level = 20 + -98;
> range->avg_qual.noise = 0;
> range->avg_qual.updated = 7; /* Updated all three */
> @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static iw_handler r8192_wx_handlers[] =
> #else
> NULL,
> #endif
> - dummy, /* SIOCGIWAPLIST -- depricated */
> + dummy, /* SIOCGIWAPLIST -- deprecated */
> r8192_wx_set_scan, /* SIOCSIWSCAN */
> r8192_wx_get_scan, /* SIOCGIWSCAN */
> r8192_wx_set_essid, /* SIOCSIWESSID */
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h
> index f4cf280..1388664 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> Parts of this driver are based on the rtl8180 driver skeleton from Patric Schenke & Andres Salomon
> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver
>
> - We want to tanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
> + We want to thanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
Same comment here as the previous comment above.
> */
>
> /* this file (will) contains wireless extension handlers*/
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h
> index 2ac4216..e07f8b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ typedef struct _RT_HIGH_THROUGHPUT{
> u8 bEnableHT;
> u8 bCurrentHTSupport;
>
> - u8 bRegBW40MHz; // Tx 40MHz channel capablity
> + u8 bRegBW40MHz; // Tx 40MHz channel capability
> u8 bCurBW40MHz; // Tx 40MHz channel capability
>
> u8 bRegShortGI40MHz; // Tx Short GI for 40Mhz
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
> index 9348f42..ec1eeb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ SendTxCommandPacket(
> seg_ptr = skb_put(skb, buffer_len);
> /*
> * Transform from little endian to big endian
> - * and pending zero
> + * and pending zero
> */
> memcpy(seg_ptr,codevirtualaddress,buffer_len);
> tcb_desc->txbuf_size= (u16)buffer_len;
> @@ -718,15 +718,15 @@ cmpk_message_handle_rx(
> /* 2. Read virtual address from RFD. */
> pcmd_buff = pstats->virtual_address;
>
> - /* 3. Read command pakcet element id and length. */
> + /* 3. Read command packet element id and length. */
> element_id = pcmd_buff[0];
> /*RT_TRACE(COMP_SEND, DebugLevel,
> ("\n\r[CMPK]-->element ID=%d Len=%d", element_id, total_length));*/
>
> - /* 4. Check every received command packet conent according to different
> + /* 4. Check every received command packet content according to different
> element type. Because FW may aggregate RX command packet to minimize
> transmit time between DRV and FW.*/
> - // Add a counter to prevent to locked in the loop too long
> + // Add a counter to prevent the lock in the loop to be to long
Perhaps "... to prevent the lock in the loop to be held too long" would be
better?
> while (total_length > 0 || exe_cnt++ >100)
> {
> /* 2007/01/17 MH We support aggregation of different cmd in the same packet. */
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c
> index 4bb5fff..fe5776d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c
> @@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ bool init_firmware(struct net_device *dev)
>
> /*
> * Download boot, main, and data image for System reset.
> - * Download data image for firmware reseta
> + * Download data image for firmware reset
> */
> for(init_step = starting_state; init_step <= FW_INIT_STEP2_DATA; init_step++) {
> /*
> - * Open Image file, and map file to contineous memory if open file success.
> + * Open Image file, and map file to continuous memory if open file success.
Why "Image" and not "image"?
> * or read image file from array. Default load from IMG file
> */
> if(rst_opt == OPT_SYSTEM_RESET) {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
> index c4586b0..636d6fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static u32 RF_CHANNEL_TABLE_ZEBRA[] = {
> * and do register read/write
> * input: u32 dwBitMask //taget bit pos in the addr to be modified
> * output: none
> - * return: u32 return the shift bit bit position of the mask
> + * return: u32 return the shift bit position of the mask
> * ****************************************************************************/
> u32 rtl8192_CalculateBitShift(u32 dwBitMask)
> {
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ u32 rtl8192_phy_RFSerialRead(struct net_device* dev, RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath,
> rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, pPhyReg->rfHSSIPara2, bLSSIReadEdge, 0x1);
>
>
> - // TODO: we should not delay such a long time. Ask help from SD3
> + // TODO: we should not delay such a long time. Ask help from SD3
How about "Ask for help" rather than "Ask help" ?
> msleep(1);
>
> ret = rtl8192_QueryBBReg(dev, pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBack, bLSSIReadBackData);
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void rtl8192_phy_RFSerialWrite(struct net_device* dev, RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath
> NewOffset = Offset;
> }
>
> - // Put write addr in [5:0] and write data in [31:16]
> + // Put write addr in [5:0] and write data in [31:16]
> DataAndAddr = (Data<<16) | (NewOffset&0x3f);
>
> // Write Operation
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ void rtl8192_phy_configmac(struct net_device* dev)
> }
>
> /******************************************************************************
> - *function: This function do dirty work
> + *function: This function does dirty work
> * input: dev
> * output: none
> * return: none
> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ void rtl8192_phyConfigBB(struct net_device* dev, u8 ConfigType)
> void rtl8192_InitBBRFRegDef(struct net_device* dev)
> {
> struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
> -// RF Interface Sowrtware Control
> +// RF Interface Software Control
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_A].rfintfs = rFPGA0_XAB_RFInterfaceSW; // 16 LSBs if read 32-bit from 0x870
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_B].rfintfs = rFPGA0_XAB_RFInterfaceSW; // 16 MSBs if read 32-bit from 0x870 (16-bit for 0x872)
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_C].rfintfs = rFPGA0_XCD_RFInterfaceSW;// 16 LSBs if read 32-bit from 0x874
> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ void rtl8192_InitBBRFRegDef(struct net_device* dev)
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_C].rfintfe = rFPGA0_XC_RFInterfaceOE;// 16 MSBs if read 32-bit from 0x86A (16-bit for 0x86A)
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_D].rfintfe = rFPGA0_XD_RFInterfaceOE;// 16 MSBs if read 32-bit from 0x86C (16-bit for 0x86E)
>
> - //Addr of LSSI. Wirte RF register by driver
> + //Addr of LSSI. Write RF register by driver
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_A].rf3wireOffset = rFPGA0_XA_LSSIParameter; //LSSI Parameter
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_B].rf3wireOffset = rFPGA0_XB_LSSIParameter;
> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_C].rf3wireOffset = rFPGA0_XC_LSSIParameter;
> @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ u8 rtl8192_phy_SwChnlStepByStep(struct net_device *dev, u8 channel, u8* stage, u
> }
>
> /******************************************************************************
> - *function: This function does acturally set channel work
> + *function: This function does actually set channel work
> * input: struct net_device *dev
> * u8 channel
> * output: none
> @@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ void rtl8192_SwChnl_WorkItem(struct net_device *dev)
> }
>
> /******************************************************************************
> - *function: This function scheduled actural workitem to set channel
> + *function: This function scheduled actual workitem to set channel
Shouldn't "workitem" be two words "work item" ?
> * input: net_device dev
> * u8 channel //channel to set
> * output: none
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h
> index 06b0b53..50f24dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
> #define bCCKRxIG 0x7f00
> #define bCCKLNAPolarity 0x800000
> #define bCCKRx1stGain 0x7f0000
> -#define bCCKRFExtend 0x20000000 //CCK Rx Iinital gain polarity
> +#define bCCKRFExtend 0x20000000 //CCK Rx inital gain polarity
> #define bCCKRxAGCSatLevel 0x1f000000
> #define bCCKRxAGCSatCount 0xe0
> #define bCCKRxRFSettle 0x1f //AGCsamp_dly
>
--
Jesper Juhl <jj at chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
More information about the devel
mailing list