[PATCH v4 0/6] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
Ramirez Luna, Omar
omar.ramirez at ti.com
Tue May 3 20:48:07 UTC 2011
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011 17:31:46 Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>> Rework and rebase of the previous set of patches for iommu migration.
>> Reorganized the patches to avoid several iterations to change the same code.
>> Patches were tested with an OMAP3630 board, with both, basic samples and
>> gst-dsp; these are dependant on patch:
>> "OMAP: iovmm: fix SW flags passed by user".
> The code removal in this series looks good, but the move from
> one proprietary iommu API to another proprietary iommu API
> seems pointless.
> It would be much more helpful if you could convert the tidspbridge
> code to the dma-mapping API, or to the generic iommu API
> and provide these interfaces from the omap code.
Yes, I thought removing a bunch of lines from staging might be good.
I'll check what can be done to use generic iommu or dma-mapping.
More information about the devel