[PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused wrapper - vmbus_onchannel_event()

KY Srinivasan kys at microsoft.com
Tue Jun 7 19:58:50 UTC 2011



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:59 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; gregkh at suse.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> devel at linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization at lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
> Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused wrapper -
> vmbus_onchannel_event()
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:59:32PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch at infradead.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:15 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: gregkh at suse.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> > > devel at linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization at lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
> > > Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused wrapper
> -
> > > vmbus_onchannel_event()
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:49:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > Now, get rid of the unused wrapper - vmbus_onchannel_event().
> > >
> > > I'd merge this into the previous patch.  In general your patch split
> > > seem a little too fine grained to me in general.  When you remove a
> > > wrapper you can inline it into the callsite directly, if you clean up a
> > > function directly inlining it into the helper is fine, etc.
> > >
> > I agree with you that some of these patches are too fine grained; but
> > I thought that was what was expected - "one change per patch".
> 
> Yes, but don't take it to an extreme, like you have done here :)

Will do in the future. Should I re-spin any of the patches in this set to make them less
"fine-grained".

Regards,

K. Y 




More information about the devel mailing list