[PATCH 00/83] staging: ath6kl: Style cleanup

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:09:07PM -0800, Vipin Mehta wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:55:09AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:48:40AM -0800, Vipin Mehta wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:38:30AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:23:18AM -0800, Vipin Mehta wrote:
> > > > > The following set of patches fixes the driver's coding style in 
> > > > > accordance with the Linux kernel coding style. The patches ended 
> > > > > being huge so putting them up on a shared location where they can 
> > > > > be retrieved using wget.
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~vmehta/ath6kl-cleanup.tar.bz2
> > > > 
> > > > Interesting, however the very first patch fails to apply :(
> > > 
> > > I generated the patches after rebasing my tree to the
> > > remotes/origin/staging-linus in the staging-2.6 tree. I tested it
> > > again just a whilw back and the patches do apply.
> > 
> > These patches are NOT for staging-linus as they are not to go to him
> > until the .39 merge window is open, right?  Please rebase them on the
> > staging-next tree.
> >
> The only difference in ath6kl between the staging-linus and staging-next 
> is the following patch that was applied yesterday in the staging-linus 
> branch:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6.git;a=commit;h=64911e4b133ff633563d6dd2b021fa1ca0608992
> 
> The reason I used staging-linus is because I wanted to apply these 
> patches on top of the above patch which we will have to do eventually. 

That's nice, but not how I can do things, sorry.

> We will have to go through the pain later which I already went through 
> yesterday while redoing these patches on top of the above one. Is it 
> possible for you to apply the commit 
> 64911e4b133ff633563d6dd2b021fa1ca0608992 
> before applying this series?

No, I don't want to apply the same patch to 2 different branches.  When
that patch is in Linus's tree, then I will worry about merging them
together, but that's something I do all the time, and not a big deal.

I need this series against the proper branch, if I am going to be able
to apply them.

Otherwise I will gladly just ignore them, which is not what I think you
or Joe wants...

thanks,

greg k-h