[PATCH 21/21] staging: brcm80211: remove usage of struct osl_info from util sources
Arend van Spriel
arend at broadcom.com
Fri Feb 25 14:20:01 UTC 2011
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:17:03 +0100, Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:31:40AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> Most of the util source files do not need the osl_info anymore due
>> to previous patches so usage of it has been removed.
>>
>> @@ -1907,15 +1901,17 @@ static int initvars_srom_pci(si_t *sih, void
>> *curmap, char **vars, uint *count)
>> }
>> #if defined(BCMNVRAMR)
>> /* Use OTP if SPROM not available */
>> - else if ((err = otp_read_pci(osh, sih, srom, SROM_MAX)) == 0) {
>> - /* OTP only contain SROM rev8/rev9 for now */
>> - sromrev = srom[SROM4_CRCREV] & 0xff;
>> - }
>> -#endif
>> else {
>> - err = 1;
>> - BS_ERROR(("Neither SPROM nor OTP has valid image\n"));
>> + err = otp_read_pci(sih, srom, SROM_MAX);
>> + if (err == 0)
>> + /* OTP only contain SROM rev8/rev9 for now */
>> + sromrev = srom[SROM4_CRCREV] & 0xff;
>> + else {
>> + err = 1;
>> + BS_ERROR(("Neither SPROM nor OTP has valid image\n"));
>> + }
>> }
>> +#endif
>
> In the original code, if si_is_sprom_available() returns false and
> BCMNVRAMR is not defined, then err is set to 1, but in the new code
> it's 0.
>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Hmmm,
Given the dependencies of these patches I probably should resend the whole
series.
Gr. AvS
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the
human
mind to correlate all its contents." - "The Call of Cthulhu"
More information about the devel
mailing list