[PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Code cleanup
greg at kroah.com
Thu Dec 8 19:25:33 UTC 2011
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:01:39PM -0200, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0000, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> >>This patch removes commented code, useless comments, blank lines and fix
> >>coding style of the headers of functions.
> >>Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage at gmail.com>
> >>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at suse.de>
> >>Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> >> /*
> >>- * Description: Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>- *
> >>- * Parameters:
> >>- * In:
> >>- * dwIoBase - I/O base address
> >>- * byContntOffset - address of EEPROM
> >>- * byTestBits - bits to test
> >>- * Out:
> >>- * none
> >>- *
> >>- * Return Value: true if all test bits off; otherwise false
> >>- *
> >>+ * Test if bits off in eeprom
> >> */
> >Some of these seems sort of useful. It might be better to change
> >them to doc-book format instead of deleting them:
> >* SROMbIsRegBitsOff() - Test if bits off in eeprom
> >* @dwIoBase: I/O base address
> >* @byContntOffset: Address of EEPROM
> >* @byTestBits: Bits to test
> >* Returns true if all test bits off; otherwise false.
> >There is a howto in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.
> Thanks for the suggestion Dan. I will do it for these 3 patches.
> Greg, please delte this patches, I will sent them again.
Ugh, "which" patches are you referring to?
I see lots here from you, with different back-and-forth from Dan, and I
don't really see an easy way to tell which thread from which, given that
you didn't thread the patches using git-send-email.
So, I've dropped all patches from you from my patch queue, can you
please resend the ones that I am supposed to apply that have been
reviewed by Dan as being acceptable?
More information about the devel