[PATCH 019/117] Staging: hv: vmbus: Cleanup vmbus_uevent() code

KY Srinivasan kys at microsoft.com
Wed Aug 24 14:12:43 UTC 2011



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:00 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh at suse.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> devel at linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization at lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 019/117] Staging: hv: vmbus: Cleanup vmbus_uevent() code
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:38:09AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:50 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: gregkh at suse.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> > > devel at linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization at lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 019/117] Staging: hv: vmbus: Cleanup vmbus_uevent()
> code
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:46:07AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > Now generate appropriate uevent based on the modalias string. As part of
> this,
> > > > cleanup the existing uevent code.
> > >
> > > Note, you just change the user api here, did you have tools that relied
> > > on the old format?  If so, they just broke :(
> >
> > Prior to this, I don't think autoloading worked the way it should for these
> > modules.
> 
> It didn't?  How did the mouse driver get autoloaded then, through the
> pci/dmi tables?

You are right, prior to this all drivers were loaded using pci/dmi signatures.

Regards,

K. Y



More information about the devel mailing list