[PATCH] Staging: vt6656: remove unnecessary #ifdef
Charles Clément
caratorn at gmail.com
Wed May 12 14:38:05 UTC 2010
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:12:54AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:46:41PM -0700, Charles Cl?ment wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:00:56PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:47:27PM -0700, Charles Cl?ment wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Cl?ment <caratorn at gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h | 5 -----
> > > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h b/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h
> > > > index 692b63e..5768862 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h
> > > > @@ -133,11 +133,6 @@ typedef DWORD * PDWORD;
> > > >
> > > > typedef QWORD * PQWORD;
> > > >
> > > > -// handle declaration
> > > > -#ifdef STRICT
> > > > typedef void *HANDLE;
> > > > -#else
> > > > -typedef void *HANDLE;
> > > > -#endif
> > >
> > > This doesn't apply at all :(
> >
> > That is strange, I could apply it without problem with today's tree.
>
> What tree are you making this against? Please do it against the
> linux-next tree, not Linus's tree.
>
I checked out the tag next-20100511, so I think it is the linux-next
tree. Maybe there's a problem with the way I update my repository,
that's what I do:
git remote update
git checkout -b latest-next next-20100511
Thanks,
--
Charles Clément
More information about the devel
mailing list