[PATCH] Staging:rtl8192e: fix comments style issue in r8180_93cx6.c This is a patch to the r8180_93cx6.c file that fixes up the comments styling issues found by the checkpatch.pl tool Signed-off-by: Tim Schofield <tim at weberpafrica.com>

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:35:16PM +0000, tim at weberpafrica.com wrote:
> From: Tim Schofield <tim.schofield1960 at googlemail.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c |   22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c
> index 262ed5f..60fba80 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c
> @@ -23,12 +23,14 @@
>  static void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
>  {
>  	if (bit)
> +		/* enable EPROM */
>  		write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
>  			       (1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT) | \
> -			       read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)); //enable EPROM
> +			       read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
>  	else
> +		/* disable EPROM */
>  		write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)\
> -			       &~(1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT)); //disable EPROM
> +			       &~(1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT));

This does not do what you think it does (hint, you need {} if you want
to have more than one line in an if statement...)

Can you always verify that your coding style changes do not actually
break the code?  A simple comparison of the .ko file before and after
should be sufficient.

thanks,

greg k-h