various vmbus review comments
KY Srinivasan
kys at microsoft.com
Fri May 6 06:10:38 PDT 2011
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 12:32 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh at suse.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> devel at linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization at lists.osdl.org
> Subject: Re: various vmbus review comments
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:20:11PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:47 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: gregkh at suse.de; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> > > - module reference counting. Are you sure you got it all right
> > > for the individual modules that attach to the bus? I don't
> > > see any reference counting happening, is that correct?
> >
> > For this round, I want to concentrate on just the vmbus driver. So,
> > module reference counting is I don't think an issue for the vmbus driver
> > given that the driver is not unlodable. Once I am done with the vmbus driver
> > I will address the module reference counting issues for other drivers.
>
> No, I am referring to the module reference counting of the bus drivers
> that register with the vmbus core. You aren't doing that at all, and
> you probably need to make sure that this isn't needed. That is
> concentrating on the vmbus driver.
I audited the block and the net drivers. As part of their exit routine,
they invoke vmbus_child_driver_unregister() after properly cleaning
up all the devices they are managing. Do you still see an issue with
regards to module reference counting.
>
> > I will also address your comment on static initialization hv_driver instances
> > as part of other driver cleanup.
>
> No, please do this now as it will show how to properly interact with the
> vmbus core code in the correct manner. Hopefully that will be correct,
> but I have a feeling that it will show you some places in the API that
> need to be changed...
As opposed to run-time initialization of fields such as probe, etc; I have
initialized them statically. For instance, in the blkvsc driver:
/* The one and only one */
static struct storvsc_driver blkvsc_drv = {
.base.probe = blkvsc_probe,
.base.remove = blkvsc_remove,
.base.shutdown = blkvsc_shutdown,
};
Is this what you had in mind.
Regards,
K. Y
More information about the devel
mailing list